Cyclists: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!
Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!”
In this episode, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation examines a case involving a cyclist who suffered catastrophic injuries after leaving a designated bike path and riding into a hole in the brush beside it. The cyclist sued the municipality, arguing that the surrounding area fell within the municipality’s responsibility to maintain the highway safely. The court ultimately found that the area where the accident occurred was outside the “travelled portion” of the highway, meaning the municipality could not be held liable. The case raised broader questions about how courts define the boundaries of highways and the extent of municipal responsibility for adjacent public spaces.
…Cyclists: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!Read More »
Cyclists: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Read More »







