Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!”
In this episode, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation discusses a constitutional challenge to a provincial declaration—and why the Supreme Court of Canada missed an opportunity to define the limits of provincial powers when it comes to international issues.
This issue to some extent arose in the recent British Columbia Supreme Court case of Rex v. Andre Paul Chauvin, which involved an appeal against a conviction for using an electronic device while driving contrary to the Motor Vehicle Act. The appeal centred on whether the original trial judge, Judicial Justice Blackstone, had misunderstood key evidence presented by Mr. Chauvin, who represented himself.
This week on Driving Law, Kyla Lee and Paul Doroshenko take a deep dive into two major developments in law and driving that show how privacy breaches and government decisions continue to ripple across BC and beyond.
Receiving a traffic ticket can feel like an inconvenience, but it may have lasting consequences if not properly addressed. In British Columbia, fighting a traffic ticket can be complicated, and in some cases, hiring a lawyer can significantly improve the outcome. Led by Kyla Lee, Acumen Law focuses on helping clients navigate the complexities of traffic tickets and ensure they get the best possible resolution. Here are some reasons why hiring a lawyer for your traffic ticket in BC might be the best decision you can make.
This Week on Weird and Wacky Wednesdays: Bad Driving Never Stops
Spring is here. It seems a few folks often mistake the seasonal buzz for a good time to make some uniquely bad decisions. This week we’re sticking with the realm of bad driving decisions that remind us that foolishness on the road is alive and well.
This week on Driving Law, Kyla Lee and Paul Doroshenko dive into the BC government’s newly announced overhaul of the province’s graduated licensing system—a change that’s already making waves on TikTok.
British Columbia’s Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) system is lauded by the government as an efficient tool for combating impaired driving. But behind the veneer of public safety lies a deeply flawed, grossly unfair process that tramples on fundamental principles of justice.
Chief among its failures is the absurdly short seven-day window to dispute an IRP. This arbitrary timeline—designed more for bureaucratic convenience than for fairness—sets countless individuals up for failure, leaving them powerless against a system stacked against them.
This Week on Weird and Wacky Wednesdays: Springtime Speed, Social Media Stunts, and the Trouble with Cars
Spring has finally arrived, and with it comes the annual boost in energy that seems to grip every driver. Warmer weather, longer days, and dry roads tempt people to roll down the windows, crank the music, and put the pedal down just a little farther. There’s a sense of freedom in the air—and behind the wheel—that can be hard to resist.
But while the mood may change with the season, the law does not. The rules of the road still apply. Police across Canada are on alert this time of year, monitoring for distracted driving, speeding, stunting, and other infractions that tend to spike once winter is behind us. Tickets are being handed out. Vehicles are being impounded. And roadside stops can quickly turn into court dates.
Of course, some people don’t just drive fast—they drive foolishly. For clout, for attention, or simply because they believe their phone screen is more important than the people around them. A trend over the past few years has seen individuals committing crimes or traffic offences in their vehicles while livestreaming to the world. These incidents are not only reckless but also highlight the disconnect some drivers have from the consequences of their actions—especially when the internet is involved.
Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!”
In this episode, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation addresses a serious constitutional issue: individuals in Alberta being detained longer than the legally permitted 24 hours due to systemic under-resourcing—without the Supreme Court stepping in to clarify the legal consequences.
This week on Driving Law, Kyla Lee and Paul Doroshenko take a deep dive into two legal cases that raise big questions about justice, delay, and mental health on the road.
First, they unpack a newly released BC Provincial Court decision in R v. Carr, where a defence lawyer attempted to argue that a traffic ticket should be thrown out for unreasonable delay—even though it was the lawyer’s own Charter application that created the delay. The court firmly rejected the argument, clarifying that you can’t manufacture delay and then claim a breach of the right to be tried within a reasonable time.