January 2026

Episode 438: Blinding Headlights, Parking Tickets, and Impaired Driving Myths

This week on Driving Law, Kyla Lee and Paul Doroshenko unpack a busy slate of driving law issues, from dangerously bright headlights to parking tickets, impaired driving policy, and public misconceptions about enforcement.

Episode 438: Blinding Headlights, Parking Tickets, and Impaired Driving Myths Read More »

Kyla Lee on CBC’s On The Coast with Gloria Macarenko: Soapbox Social: The crowded race to be Vancouver’s next mayor

Pete Fry is hoping that for the first time since 2005, Vancouverites might elect a city councillor as its next mayor….

Kyla Lee on CBC’s On The Coast with Gloria Macarenko: Soapbox Social: The crowded race to be Vancouver’s next mayor Read More »

Kyla Lee with Soni Dhingra on Québec v. Luamba

Quebec v. Luamba is a Supreme Court of Canada case currently being heard about whether police can legally stop drivers without any specific suspicion. Quebec’s courts struck down the province’s random stop law after finding it leads to disproportionate stops of Black drivers and violates Charter rights, particularly freedom from arbitrary detention and equality rights. The Supreme Court is now deciding whether that ruling should stand and could reshape how police powers are exercised across Canada.

Kyla Lee with Soni Dhingra on Québec v. Luamba Read More »

Impaired Driving Update – BC Edition: Volume 9

Welcome to British Columbia’s only weekly DUI law update newsletter. This newsletter contains the most cutting-edge information, the newest case law, and helpful practice tips for DUI defence in BC.

Authored by Kyla Lee, BC’s Impaired Driving Update is released weekly on Thursdays.

What’s inside:

  • Impaired Driving Defence Tip
  • IRP Decision of the Week
  • DUI Decision of the Week
  • Kyla’s Insight

Impaired Driving Update – BC Edition: Volume 9 Read More »

Weird and Wacky Wednesdays: Volume 384

This week on Weird and Wacky Wednesdays: The Naked Truth About DUIs

Occasionally, the police pull people over who are naked. It happens in Canada. It happens in the United States. Sometimes it happens to our clients. Most of the time, it ends up being a DUI investigation. Often, there is body cam footage and complicating factors due to the lack of clothing. 

Of course we are in Canada, so we do not technically use the term “DUI.” Here, it is “Impaired Driving.” But for today we’re going to stick with “Naked DUI” Because these weird and wacky DUI cases all come from the States. 

It is worth noting that this is not really a winter phenomenon. Naked impaired driving tends to be a summer activity. Warm weather parties, alcohol, and poor decisions seem to come together when the warm weather hits. January is gloomy. February is worse. So somehow it seemed like a good time to think about summer, sunshine, and the naked truth about DUIs. 

Weird and Wacky Wednesdays: Volume 384 Read More »

R v Oliphant – The Case That Turned on a Staple

R. v. Oliphant 2025 SKKB 4 is a Crown appeal regarding the acquittal of Cam Oliphant, who had been charged with operating a conveyance with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) at or exceeding 80 mg per 100 mL.

During the original trial, Crown provided evidence that Mr. Oliphant’s breath samples showed readings of 90 mg% and 80 mg% respectively. However, the trial judge acquitted Mr. Oliphant after ruling the approved instrument printout was inadmissible. The trial judge found the document failed to meet the requirements of s. 320.33 of the Criminal Code because the technician’s certification referred to an “attached” printout, yet the printout was not physically stapled or clipped to the certificate. 

R v Oliphant – The Case That Turned on a Staple Read More »

Post-Arrest Statements: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!”

In this episode, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation examines the legal treatment of post-arrest statements, especially when used to challenge credibility in court. The case involved someone who made a spontaneous statement to police shortly after being arrested, and later testified differently in court. The Crown sought to use the earlier statement to suggest the person had recently fabricated their testimony. The Supreme Court of Canada declined to hear the appeal.

Post-Arrest Statements: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Read More »

Episode 437: Random Traffic Stops, Racial Profiling, and the Supreme Court’s Reckoning

The Supreme Court of Canada has heard a major case challenging the power of police to conduct arbitrary traffic stops in the face of mounting evidence of racial profiling. This week on Driving Law, Kyla Lee and Paul Doroshenko unpack what’s at stake — and what could finally change.

Episode 437: Random Traffic Stops, Racial Profiling, and the Supreme Court’s Reckoning Read More »

Kyla Lee on CBC’s On The Coast with Gloria Macarenko: Soapbox Social: Is extortion a crisis in B.C.?

The head of B.C.’s extortion task force is walking back comments he made Tuesday that the region is not in an extortion crime-related crisis after Premier David Eby demanded he step up his urgency or step down from his role…

“…There are situations where something becomes a crisis and that allows government to make emergency orders, which can then allow the government to do more than they would otherwise be legally permitted to do. So, labelling it a ‘crisis’ I think in the legal context, is getting into that dangerous territory…”

Listen here.

Kyla Lee on CBC’s On The Coast with Gloria Macarenko: Soapbox Social: Is extortion a crisis in B.C.? Read More »

Scroll to Top
CALL ME NOW