Blog

Last week, we talked about idiot-proofing in the DRE test. This week, we address another step in the Drug Recognition Evaluation that is designed to make sure the police do not completely bungle the test. This is known as the interview of the arresting officer.

In many cases, though not all, the person who makes the arrest of a supposed impaired driver is not trained in the Drug Recognition Evaluation program. As a result of the lack of training, this person cannot administer the test and another officer must be summoned to do it. This will be common in Canada, as after cannabis legalization we will still have very few trained officers in Canada.

So the interview is a very important step.

A few weeks ago, I wrote a blog post about the cell phone immobilizer case. To remind you, a man was acquitted at trial of using an electronic device while driving on the basis of the fact that he had his phone equipped with an app that would disable it from use while driving.

The case received a lot of press, mostly because up until now there have been very few defences in electronic device cases. And the more press a successful case receives, the more likely it seems to be that the Crown considers an appeal. I have no knowledge of whether they are or are not, but it seems to me that one is likely in this case.

And here’s why.

In episode 17 of the Driving Law with Kyla Lee podcast, we talk to Camille Labchuk of Animal Justice about the intersection of animals and the law. Ms. Labchuk and I speak about the law in relation to hot cars and dogs, as well as federal transportation laws involving animals and what obligations transport companies have when it comes to driving animals around. This is a really interesting area where driving and other areas of the law intersect, and the discussion this week is worth a listen.

You can find it on iTunes here and on PlayerFM or SoundCloud.

Following last week’s post on the twelve weeks of DRE-mas, I am writing about the first of the twelve steps in this twelve-step program. The first step is a breath alcohol test. Now, I know that some people might think that seems normal: alcohol is a drug, after all. However, a breath alcohol test is actually a built-in safeguard because it’s common for police to get it wrong.

This is is the idiot-proofing step.

Today the BC Supreme Court released its reasons in the case of R. v. Singh. The BC Supreme Court allowed an appeal from conviction and, instead of remitting the matter for a new trial in traffic court the Supreme Court entered an acquittal. The reason for the acquittal was that there had been a miscarriage of justice.

This decision poses a significant problem for numerous traffic court convictions that have come before and since. And it may be that hundreds of traffic ticket convictions must be overturned based on today’s ruling.

Reports were released recently indicating that MGM Resorts International has filed lawsuits against the victims of the Las Vegas mass shooting. MGM Resorts International is the parent company of the Mandalay Bay resort, which sponsored the Harvest Festival where the shooting victims were found. They were shot from the window of a hotel room in the Mandalay Bay hotel.

After the shooting, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of the victims of the shooting and their families, claiming that the hotel was liable for failing to take adequate precaution to protect its guests and festival attendees.

Since the announcement of the saliva tester for drugs last week, many people have been wondering if there is an effective replacement for saliva testing. The concerns that people have around saliva testing include temperature sensitivity, that the device has difficult operating procedures, and that THC stores in the body over a long period, so the device is not testing actual impairment.
 
Among many other concerns.
 
Some have said that a marijuana breathalyzer will eliminate most of these concerns. After all, a marijuana breathalyser will not produce a piece of evidence, containing a person’s DNA. It will not take as long to take a sample, and it’s a roadside procedure with which we are already generally comfortable and familiar. And California has now unveiled the first marijuana breathalyzer ready for law enforcement use.
 
But the marijuana breathalyzer suffers from flaws too.