Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!”
In today’s episode, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation examines a tragic bus crash case that raises critical issues about product liability, government safety standards, and negligence.
I love TikTok. It’s a platform I post on regularly. I find it entertaining and I learn things too. Coming up with topics isn’t always easy, but I’ve managed to make it look easy. Unlike some content creators, I steer clear of stunts. In Canada, TikTokers can’t monetise their accounts, so for creators in our lovely country, it’s a true labour of love. Without the pressure to generate views, the platform feels lighter and more genuine. That said, content creators in the U.S. sometimes take things way too far in their quest for internet fame. Here are a few instances where things didn’t go according to plan.
Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!”
In today’s episode, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation examines a manslaughter case involving Mr. Toth, which raises crucial questions about lay opinions, social media’s influence, and evidentiary standards in court.
This week on Weird and Wacky Wednesdays, we’re diving into the strange and surprisingly common world of insurance fraud. While some crimes might be rooted in desperation, the frauds we’re looking at today seem to have more to do with greed. What stands out isn’t just the sheer audacity of these schemes but also the creativity involved. In tough times, we often see an increase in these types of crimes, but it’s hard to imagine that personal financial hardship drove the people in these cases.
Driving without due care and attention is a serious offence in British Columbia, carrying significant penalties. This blog post examines the law surrounding this offence, outlines what the Crown must prove to secure a conviction, and discusses potential defences.
Acumen Law Corporation lawyer Kyla Lee gives her take on a made-in-Canada court case each week and discusses why these cases should have been heard by Canada’s highest court: the Supreme Court of Canada.
British Columbia’s courts have interpreted and applied the province’s distracted driving legislation in nuanced ways. Examining the leading cases allows people to understand the law as it pertains to the use of electronic devices while driving.
Here are some of the leading cases you need to know if you are facing a distracted driving charge in BC.
Paying a traffic ticket online in British Columbia seems way too simple, but there’s more to it than just making a payment. Here are 10 essential things to consider before you click “pay” on that speeding or traffic violation ticket:
If you’ve been charged in British Columbia with driving at or over the legal limit of 0.08 BAC, refusing a breath test, or driving under drug impairment, you’ll likely face a 90-day Administrative Driving Prohibition (ADP). This driving ban is often the first major issue to address in cases of alleged impaired driving. But there’s good news – you can challenge this prohibition, provided you act quickly.
The R v Morgan, 2024 ABCA 345 case provides valuable insight into the sentencing considerations for dangerous driving causing death in Canada and the factors that can lead to a sentence reduction.
The case involved Johnathan Morgan, who pled guilty to three charges: dangerous operation of a motor vehicle causing death, failure to remain at the scene of an accident, and operating a motor vehicle while prohibited. The trial judge initially sentenced Morgan to a total of eight years imprisonment but, upon appeal, this sentence was reduced to five years.
Examining this case helps illuminate the complexities of sentencing in such cases and highlights the legal principles that guide appellate court decisions.