self-representation

The “Last-Minute Disclosure” Traffic Court Strategy – And Why it is Bound to Fail

Many drivers in British Columbia believe that representing themselves in traffic court is a simple way to save money. Some even attempt to use a specific legal “strategy.” That is, waiting until the very last minute to request evidence (disclosure) and then asking for an adjournment. The goal is usually to push the case past the 18-month “unreasonable delay” limit set by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Jordan, hoping the ticket will be thrown out entirely.

However, a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of British Columbia in R. v. Newby, 2025 BCSC 2483, has made it clear that this tactic is likely to fail. Here is why self-representation and manufactured delays are a risky gamble.

…

The “Last-Minute Disclosure” Traffic Court Strategy – And Why it is Bound to FailRead More »

The “Last-Minute Disclosure” Traffic Court Strategy – And Why it is Bound to Fail Read More »

Episode 430: Mandatory vs. Suspicion Demands, Uber Drivers, & Christmas Lights

This week on Driving Law, Kyla and Paul take on a deeply concerning Ontario ruling that blurs the line between lawful and unlawful ASD demands, raising major Charter implications. They also dig into a BC guilty plea decision affecting Uber drivers, Ontario’s proposal for child-support penalties, and a festive but illegal Ridiculous Driver of the Week.

…

Episode 430: Mandatory vs. Suspicion Demands, Uber Drivers, & Christmas LightsRead More »

Episode 430: Mandatory vs. Suspicion Demands, Uber Drivers, & Christmas Lights Read More »

Your Right to a Fair Hearing: Allegations of Bias in Traffic Court

Disputing a traffic ticket can often feel like an uphill battle, especially when you’re representing yourself. Self-represented people often do not have the benefit of knowledge of legal procedure or knowledge of the particular quirks of a judge or justice presiding over their case. It is therefore important for the players involved in traffic court, including the officer prosecuting the ticket and the judicial justice, to ensure the trial is fair.

A recent decision from the Supreme Court of British Columbia, R. v. Advincula, 2025 BCSC 1662, has highlighted the importance of procedural fairness in traffic court.

…

Your Right to a Fair Hearing: Allegations of Bias in Traffic CourtRead More »

Your Right to a Fair Hearing: Allegations of Bias in Traffic Court Read More »

Scroll to Top
CALL ME NOW