evidence

Huge News: Landmark BC Supreme Court Decision on Photo Radar Evidence

gardaworld

The recent decision in R. v. Corporation Gardaworld Services Transport de Valeurs Canada (2024 BCSC 1754) represents a significant shift in the use of photographic evidence in traffic violation cases in British Columbia, particularly those involving speed cameras and red light cameras.

The ruling by the BC Supreme Court redirects the approach lower courts have recently taken, which has often been skeptical of relying solely on photographic evidence when key details, such as the jurisdiction of a license plate, are unclear.

Huge News: Landmark BC Supreme Court Decision on Photo Radar Evidence Read More »

The Variability Between Breath Readings and Blood Tests: Why It Matters in DUI Defence

Breath-alcohol testing is a cornerstone of impaired driving enforcement, widely used in Canada to determine whether drivers are over the legal blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) limit. However, new scientific findings shed light on a significant problem with this method of testing: the variability of the blood/breath ratio (BBR), which directly impacts the accuracy of breath-alcohol test results. This variability raises important questions about how reliable breathalyzer readings truly are, and has serious implications for those facing impaired driving charges.

At the heart of the issue is the BBR, the proportionality factor used to convert a breath-alcohol concentration (BrAC) into an estimated BAC. The standard BBR, used in all breath-alcohol testing devices in Canada, is assumed to be 2100:1. This means that 2100 mL of breath is considered equivalent to the alcohol content of 1 mL of blood. However, as discussed in a recent article by Dominick A. Labianca, The Variability of the Blood/Breath Ratio and Its Impact on the Results of Breath-Alcohol Analyses (2023), this ratio is far from fixed and can vary significantly between individuals.

The Variability Between Breath Readings and Blood Tests: Why It Matters in DUI Defence Read More »

Top 5 mistakes people make disputing their own ticket

Many people think a traffic ticket is a relatively simple matter, and believe that they should be able to defend their own traffic ticket and that it’s not worth it to hire a lawyer.

The problem is, without a sophisticated understanding of the rules of law and evidence in a courtroom, and the procedure that’s to be applied in a courtroom, people make significant mistakes while disputing their own traffic tickets.

So here are the top five mistakes we have found people make when disputing their own tickets.

Top 5 mistakes people make disputing their own ticket Read More »

Scroll to Top
CALL ME NOW