cases that should have gone to supreme court

Confessions: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!”

In this episode, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation discusses a case that raised serious questions about how mental health affects the voluntariness of confessions. In a sexual assault trial, the accused sought to exclude a statement made to police, arguing that he lacked an “operating mind” due to a severe mental health episode at the time. The court disagreed and admitted the statement. The Supreme Court of Canada declined to hear the appeal—missing a critical opportunity to modernize and clarify the voluntariness rule in light of evolving mental health understanding.

Confessions: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Read More »

Surveillance Cameras: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Today, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation discusses Duc Tung Hoang v. His Majesty the King, a case that raises critical questions about camera surveillance and its implications for privacy under Canadian law.

Surveillance Cameras: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Read More »

Circumstantial Evidence & Sexual Assault: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!”

In this episode, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation discusses a crucial case involving circumstantial evidence in a sexual assault trial, highlighting issues surrounding consent and the evidentiary standards for intoxication.

Circumstantial Evidence & Sexual Assault: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Read More »

Scroll to Top
CALL ME NOW