Kyla Lee

What Happens if You Refuse a Breathalyzer in BC?

Serious Consequences of Refusing a Breathalyzer

Refusing to take a breathalyzer test in British Columbia may seem like a way to avoid a DUI charge, but in reality, it often results in severe consequences. Under BC law, refusing a lawful request for a breath sample carries penalties that are as harsh—or sometimes harsher—than those for failing the test.

Legal Obligation to Provide a Breath Sample

Under the Criminal Code of Canada and BC’s Motor Vehicle Act, drivers are legally required to provide a breath sample if requested by law enforcement. Police officers can make this request in several circumstances, even when it might not seem obvious.

Approved Screening Device Demand

Officers can demand a breath sample during a traffic stop for suspicion-based or mandatory alcohol screening:

  • Mandatory Alcohol Screening: Allows officers to request a breath sample without any specific suspicion during lawful traffic stops.
  • Suspicion-Based Screening: Requires reasonable suspicion of alcohol consumption, such as observable signs like slurred speech or bloodshot eyes.

Both demands require immediate compliance, as delaying or refusing could result in penalties.

Approved Instrument Demand

At a police station, a more precise test using an Approved Instrument may be required. Officers must have reasonable grounds to believe a driver was impaired to issue this demand. Unlike roadside tests, drivers have the right to consult a lawyer before providing a sample.

Penalties for Refusing a Breathalyzer

Refusing a breathalyzer triggers both immediate and long-term consequences:

  • Immediate Roadside Penalties:
    • 90-day driving suspension.
    • 30-day vehicle impoundment with associated costs.
    • $500 administrative penalty.
  • Criminal Penalties:
    • Permanent criminal record.
    • Fines starting at $2,000.
    • One-year mandatory driving prohibition.
    • Increased penalties for repeat offenders, including jail time.
  • Insurance and Rehabilitation:
    • Higher ICBC insurance premiums.
    • Required participation in programs like the Responsible Driver Program or ignition interlock installation.

Defences for Refusing a Breathalyzer

Several defences may apply, depending on the specifics of your case:

  • Unlawful Breath Demand: Police must follow legal procedures when issuing a breath demand. Any failure may invalidate the charge.
  • Medical Conditions: Conditions like respiratory disorders may make compliance impossible and serve as a valid defence.
  • Unclear Instructions: If officers failed to explain the consequences of refusal, the charge could be challenged.
  • Charter Violations: Breaches of your rights, such as denial of access to legal counsel, may lead to dismissed charges.

Drivers only need to provide a “reasonable excuse” for refusing a sample, and the burden of disproving it lies with the Crown.

Why You Should Hire a Lawyer

Refusing a breathalyzer is a serious charge, but an experienced lawyer can:

  • Analyze Evidence: Identify inconsistencies or procedural errors in police reports, video recordings, or medical records.
  • Challenge Procedures: Argue for dismissal if officers failed to follow proper legal protocols.
  • Minimize Penalties: Negotiate reduced penalties or alternative sentencing arrangements to lessen long-term impacts.

Protect Your Future

Refusing a breathalyzer in BC carries significant consequences, but with the right legal strategy, you may be able to minimize or avoid penalties. Consult a lawyer immediately to protect your rights and explore your defence options.

What Happens if You Refuse a Breathalyzer in BC? Read More »

Kyla on The Mike Smyth Show: Politicians divided over Trump, Clarifying distracted driving laws, & Canada’s affordability crisis!

Canada’s politicians are completely divided on how to navigate Trump’s tariff threats. They’re disagreeing, while we’re suffering. Plus, should gig workers be allowed to use their phones while driving? Legal clarification is desperately needed! Finally, we’ll talk about a shocking reality—Canadians are now less than $200 away from not being to pay their bills!

Kyla on The Mike Smyth Show: Politicians divided over Trump, Clarifying distracted driving laws, & Canada’s affordability crisis! Read More »

Immigration Consequences & Criminal Convictions: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Today, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation discusses immigration consequences for criminal convictions and how they intersect with Canada’s criminal and immigration laws.

Immigration Consequences & Criminal Convictions: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Read More »

Kyla Lee in Vancouver Is Awesome: Are some things illegal to have on your balcony in Vancouver?

Vancouverites planning on balcony makeovers may want to consider how the changes will impact their neighbours.

While the City of Vancouver doesn’t have specific regulations focused on decorations or conduct on patios or balconies, it does have bylaws concerning how patio decorations and furniture impact neighbours. 

Residents must also consider their specific building’s rules regarding what they may have. 

Kyla Lee in Vancouver Is Awesome: Are some things illegal to have on your balcony in Vancouver? Read More »

Racketeering & Extradition: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Today, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation examines an important extradition case involving Peter Nygård, raising critical questions about how Canadian law applies comparative criminal analysis in extradition decisions.

Racketeering & Extradition: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Read More »

Kyla Lee on Global News: ICBC discontinues Vernon senior’s care after he was hit by vehicle in 2023

A retired firefighter who suffered significant injuries after being hit by a car while cycling says due to the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia’s (ICBC) no-fault insurance system, he’s not getting the care he needs.

On May 16, 2023, Wakefield was hit by a vehicle while riding his ebike in Vernon, B.C., leaving him with multiple broken ribs, a broken scapula, a broken collar bone, and a concussion.

Kyla Lee on Global News: ICBC discontinues Vernon senior’s care after he was hit by vehicle in 2023 Read More »

Kyla Lee in New Jersey Law Journal: Lawyers on TikTok Seek the Right Mix of Substance and Levity

If the U.S. government goes ahead with threats to shut down TikTok, the legal profession will suffer a loss. Some attorneys who use the popular social media platform say they like its ability to educate the public on legal issues, while others embrace its ability to help them generate name recognition.

TikTok has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block a law that could ban the social media app. The Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, signed into law in April, calls for TikTok’s Chinese owner to sell the application to an American company or face a shutdown. The law was prompted by concerns that TikTok is a security risk because it allows the collection of vast amounts of information on Americans.

Kyla Lee in New Jersey Law Journal: Lawyers on TikTok Seek the Right Mix of Substance and Levity Read More »

Why Limiting Written Submissions in IRP Cases to 30 Pages is Just Plain Unfair

Close-up of a hand adjusting an unbalanced golden scale of justice, symbolizing inequality or bias in decision-making processes.

As of January 1, 2025, the British Columbia government has bought into force a new regulation limiting written submissions in Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) cases to a paltry 30 pages.

Framed as a measure to streamline the process, this change is nothing short of an attack on the integrity of administrative justice. The IRP system, already riddled with unfairness, now shackles those trying to mount a defence with a draconian restriction that makes it nearly impossible to present a full and proper case.

This arbitrary page limit—imposed by regulation and alterable at the whim of the government—disregards the complex, technical nature of IRP disputes. It is a blatant attempt to tip the scales further in favour of the state while leaving individuals struggling to meet an unrealistic standard.

Why Limiting Written Submissions in IRP Cases to 30 Pages is Just Plain Unfair Read More »

Extradition: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!”

Today, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation discusses a critical extradition case that raises questions about the interpretation of cruel and unusual punishment under Canadian law.

Extradition: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Read More »

Stays of Administrative Proceedings: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!

Welcome to “Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t!”

Today, Kyla Lee from Acumen Law Corporation discusses an important case about stays of administrative proceedings under appeal, highlighting the broader implications for access to justice and judicial efficiency.

Stays of Administrative Proceedings: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada, But Didn’t! Read More »

Scroll to Top
CALL ME NOW