Episode 407: Speed Camera Surges, Street Racing Crackdowns, and a Charter Challenge Returns to the Supreme Court

This week on Driving Law, hosts Kyla Lee and Paul Doroshenko tackle an engaging and wide-ranging mix of personal experience, emerging legal controversies, and high-stakes constitutional issues that are shaping the legal landscape for drivers across Canada. From harrowing moments behind the wheel to the growing role of automated enforcement, and from street-level crackdowns to Supreme Court-bound Charter battles, this episode offers a thought-provoking blend of storytelling and expert legal analysis.

Kyla opens the episode with a near-death experience on the Alex Fraser Bridge after unsecured plywood flew off a truck—an incident that underscores the real dangers of unsafe loads and distracted transport. The story sets the tone for a discussion on enforcement methods and public safety.

They then analyze Ontario’s controversial speed camera program in Vaughan, where 32,000 tickets were issued in just three weeks. Despite the staggering volume, the city has temporarily paused fines, replacing them with warnings while reevaluating the system’s effectiveness. Kyla and Paul debate the merits and pitfalls of automated enforcement and the due process challenges it presents for drivers.

Next, they cover Surrey’s new “Project Rogue Racers”—a year-long crackdown on illegal street racing events. With dozens of tickets, vehicle impounds, and bylaw infractions already issued, the project marks a new level of targeted enforcement against stunt driving and high-risk gatherings.

Finally, Kyla and Paul dive deep into the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision to grant leave in R. v. Cordner, which revives the long-standing Whyte and Powers constitutional issue. The case will test whether compelled statements at accident scenes—required under traffic legislation—can be used to justify criminal investigative demands, or whether such use violates Charter rights. They explore the nuanced conflict between majority and dissenting opinions at the Alberta Court of Appeal, and why the outcome could reshape the way police interact with drivers post-accident.

Scroll to Top
CALL ME NOW